Qi, meridians, yin, yang. How can researchers study
acupuncture, a 2,000-year-old form of traditional Chinese medicine
(TCM) based on foreign concepts that seem impossible to measure, let
alone define?
To Richard Nahin, Ph.D., M.P.H., NCCAM's Senior Advisor for
Scientific Coordination and Outreach, the answer is obvious: "We don't
necessarily have to understand the concepts of qi or meridians to study
the safety or efficacy of acupuncture."
Harvard Medical School neuroscientist (and practicing acupuncturist) Vitaly Napadow, Ph.D., L.Ac.,
agrees. "I firmly believe that everything can be studied with the
scientific method. Unfortunately, we don't currently have a 'qi meter.'
So, in my research, we don't focus on meridians or qi. We take a
neuroscientific approach to study how acupuncture functions through the
nervous system."
Using the latest technologies in neuroimaging and genomics, Dr.
Napadow and other NCCAM-supported scientists are drawing a
scientifically coherent picture of how acupuncture affects the body.
They can see physiological effects—changes in the brain's pain
centers—with acupuncture. They've observed gene expression and
molecular changes in the nervous and immune systems. They hope one day
to be able to predict which patients are most likely to benefit from
acupuncture.
Scientists aren't ready to claim that acupuncture works for any
specific disease—yet. But NCCAM-supported studies have yielded
promising evidence that this ancient practice modifies perception of
pain and its processing by the brain, and that it may be helpful for
pain management. In the years since the 1997 National Institutes of
Health consensus statement on acupuncture concluded that more rigorous
research was needed, NCCAM has supported a substantial body of
research. A number of these studies have tackled the challenge of
developing trial designs needed to answer practical clinical questions.